http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2020(V-II).13
10.31703/gpr.2020(V-II).13
Published : Jun 2020
Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997
There are certain organizations and individual, which involved in terrorist activities. The 2001 Anti- Terrorism amendment section 11-A that gives criteria to take certain measures against proscribed organization and individual. There is also restriction put on the office bearer carrying activities of terrorism or they involve with proscribe organization. To counter-terrorism activities, there is Anti-Terrorism law that dismantles the funding of terrorism. So in this response, AML/CFT plays a global standard role to stop the funding of terrorism. Pakistan has taken several steps to improve Money Laundering Law and confiscate, freeze assets of terrorists (Shaheena, N. 2006). But there is a defect it doesn’t show an act, which constitutes terrorism. And also it doesn’t show evidentiary criteria to declare organization is proscribed. There are several measures taken against proscribed origination in Section11-E of this act. The main purpose of this to limit the activities of these proscribed organizations and stops th funding.
-
Organization, Proscribed, Money Laundering, Confiscate, Assets, Freez, Evidentiary, Counter Terrorism
-
(1) Naila Rafique
Lecturer, Department of Law, Women University Swabi, KP, Pakistan.
(2) Sarfaraz Khan
Assistant Professor, Centre for Caucasian Asian, Chinese and Pakistan Studies, University of Swat, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Muhammad Alam
Demonstrator, Department of Political Science, University of Buner, KP, Pakistan.
- Baron de Montesquieu, C. L. de S. (1748). Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws. Classics of Liberty, Online Library of Liberty. https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/montesquieu-complete-works-vol-1-the-spirit-of-laws
- Beckett, C. (1988). Separation of Powers and Federalism: Their Impact on Individual Liberty and the Functioning of Our Government. William & Mary Law Review, 29(3), https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr
- Bonica, A. (2016). Avenues of influence: On the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives. Business and Politics, 18(4), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2016-0004
- Bradley, C. A. (2007). Unratified Treaties, Domestic Politics, and the U.S. Constitution. Harvard International Law Journal, 48(2). https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2517&context=faculty_scholarship
- Cameron, C. M. (2011). The Presidential Veto. In G. C. Edwards III & W. G. Howell (Eds.), the Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency. Oxford University Press.
- Coleman, K. J. (2015). The voting rights act of 1965: Background and overview. Congressional Research Service Washington, DC.
- Contrubis, J. (1999). Executive Orders and Proclamations. Congressional Research Service - CRS. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/95-772.pdf
- Disch, L. (2002). The Tyranny of the Two-Party System. Columbia University Press.
- Foran, C. (2016, March 1). How Bernie Sanders Raised Millions and Set Records. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/bernie-sanders-fundraising/471648/
- Galapa, L. (2013). The doctrine of separation of powers: a critical analysis of whether it has achieved its general application in Zambia and to what extent has it been applied. [Thesis]. http://dspace.unza.zm/handle/123456789/2564
- Gerston, L. N. (2007). American Federalism: A Concise Introduction. Routledge.
- Gwyn, W. B. (1986). Review of Essays on the History and Meaning of Checks and Balances [Review of Essays on the History and Meaning of Checks and Balances, by E. P. Panagopoulos]. The William and Mary Quarterly, 43(3), 505–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/1922499
- Halstead, T. J. (2005). An Overview of the Impeachment Process (p. 6). Congressional Research Service - CRS.
- Knoke, D., & Felson, R. B. (1974). Ethnic stratification and political cleavage in the United States, 1952-68. American Journal of Sociology, 80(3), 630–642.
- Laney, G. P. (2003). The Voting Rights Act of 1965: Historical background and current issues. Nova Publishers.
- Locke, J. (1689). Concerning Civil Government. WW Norton & Company.
- Lorell, M. A., Kelley, C. T., & Hensler, D. R. (1985). Casualties, Public Opinion, and Presidential Policy during the Vietnam War: R-3060-AF. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3060.html
- Madison, J. (1788). The Federalist No. 51 (February 6, 1788). Federalist Papers, the Constitutional Sources Project. https://www.consource.org/document/the-federalist-no-51-1788-2-6/20130122080331/
- Mainwaring, S. (1990). Presidentialism, multiparty systems, and democracy: The difficult equation, Working Paper #144. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.
- McCarty, N. (2009). Presidential Vetoes in the Early Republic: Changing Constitutional Norms or Electoral Reform? The Journal of Politics, 71(2), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090331
- Miller, G. (2008). Women’s suffrage, political responsiveness, and child survival in American history. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1287–1327. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1287
- Pakistan Election Commission. (1972). Report on general elections, Pakistan, 1970-71. Manager of Publications.
- Peters, J. W., & Martin, J. (2016, April 13). Donald Trump, Losing Ground, Tries to Blame theSystem. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/13/us/politics/donald-trump-losing-ground-tries-to-blame-the-system.html
- Popowski, D. (2012, July 25). Suppressing Protest: Human Rights Violations in the U.S. Response to Occupy Wall Street. Human Rights @ Harvard Law. https://hrp.law.harvard.edu/criminal-justice/suppressing-protest-human-rights-violations-in-the-u-s-response-to-occupy-wall-street/
- Popper, A. F. (2005). A Perspective on Independent Judicial Review in Vietnam and the United States. Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Canada.
- Prakash, S. B., & Yoo, J. C. (2003). The Origins of Judicial Review. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70(3), 887–982. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600662
- Roberts, D. (2009). Why We Don’t Vote: Low Voter Turnout in U.S. Presidential Elections. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1365
- Shogan, C. J. (2015). The President’s State of the Union Address: Tradition, Function, and Policy Implications, R40132. Congressional Research Service - CRS. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R40132.pdf
- Sollenberger, M. A. (2004). The Presidential Veto and Congressional Procedure: RS21750 (United States) [Report]. Congressional Research Service - CRS. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc824686/
- Steinmo, S. (1989). Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. World Politics, 41(4), 500–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010528
- Stephens, J. O. H., & Scheb, I. J. M. (2011). American Constitutional Law: Civil Rights and Liberties, Volume II (Vol. 2). Cengage Learning.
- Stephens, J. O. H., Scheb, I. J. M., & Glennon, C. (2014). American Constitutional Law, Volume I, Sources of Power and Restraint, 6th. Cengage Learning.
- Still, J. W. (1981). Political Equality and Election Systems. Ethics, 91(3), 375–394. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2380792
- Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002). Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 777–803. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088970
- US Government. (2021, January 1). Presidential Vetoes. US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives. https://history.house.gov/Institution/Presidential-Vetoes/Presidential-Vetoes/
- Vicente, J. J. (1998). Impeachment: A Constitutional Primer, No 318. CATO Institute. https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-318.pdf
- Wai-lam, C. (2000). The Process of Appointment of Judges in Some Foreign Countries: The United States. Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council Secretariat. http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr00-01/english/panels/ajls/papers/erp01.pdf
Cite this article
-
APA : Rafique, N., Khan, S., & Alam, M. (2020). Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997. Global Political Review, V(II), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2020(V-II).13
-
CHICAGO : Rafique, Naila, Sarfaraz Khan, and Muhammad Alam. 2020. "Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997." Global Political Review, V (II): 121-127 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2020(V-II).13
-
HARVARD : RAFIQUE, N., KHAN, S. & ALAM, M. 2020. Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997. Global Political Review, V, 121-127.
-
MHRA : Rafique, Naila, Sarfaraz Khan, and Muhammad Alam. 2020. "Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997." Global Political Review, V: 121-127
-
MLA : Rafique, Naila, Sarfaraz Khan, and Muhammad Alam. "Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997." Global Political Review, V.II (2020): 121-127 Print.
-
OXFORD : Rafique, Naila, Khan, Sarfaraz, and Alam, Muhammad (2020), "Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997", Global Political Review, V (II), 121-127
-
TURABIAN : Rafique, Naila, Sarfaraz Khan, and Muhammad Alam. "Analysis of Proscribe Organizations and Preventive Detention in Anti Terrorism Act 1997." Global Political Review V, no. II (2020): 121-127. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2020(V-II).13